资讯|论坛|病例

搜索

首页 医学论坛 专业文章 医学进展 签约作者 病例中心 快问诊所 爱医培训 医学考试 在线题库 医学会议

您所在的位置:首页 > 呼吸科诊疗指南 > 2001ACCP询证指南:脱机与中止通气支持

2001ACCP询证指南:脱机与中止通气支持

2013-09-06 11:27 阅读:1417 来源:爱爱医资源网 责任编辑:李思杰
[导读] 《2001ACCP询证指南:脱机与中止通气支持》内容预览 To address many of these issues, the Agency for Health- care Policy and Research (AHCPR) charged the McMaster University Evidence Based Practice Center to do a com-prehensive evidence-based

《2001ACCP询证指南:脱机与中止通气支持》内容预览

To address many of these issues, the Agency for Health- care Policy and Research (AHCPR) charged the McMaster University Evidence Based Practice Center to do a com-prehensive evidence-based review of many of the issues involved in ventilator weaning/discontinuation. Led by Deborah Cook MD, an exhaustive review of several thou-sand articles in the world literature resulted in a compre- hensive assessment of the state of the literature in 1999.

At the same time, the American College of Chest Physi-cians (ACCP), the Society for Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the American Association for Respiratory Care (AARC) formed a task force to produce evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for managing the venti-lator-dependent patient during the discontinuation process. The charge of this task force was to utilize the McMaster AHCPR report as well as their own literature review to address the following 5 issues: (1) the pathophysiology of ventilator dependence; (2) the criteria for identifying pa-tients who are capable of ventilator discontinuation; (3) ventilator management strategies to maximize discontinu-ation potential; (4) the role of tracheotomy; and (5) the role of long-term facilities. Review/writing teams were formed for each of these issues.

From these evidence-based reviews, a series of rec-ommendations were developed by the task force, which are the basis of this report. Each recommendation is followed by a review of the supporting evidence, in-cluding an assessment of the strength of the evidence (Table 1). As there were many areas in which evidence was weak or absent, the expert opinion of the task force was relied on to “fill in the gaps.” Consensus was reached,first, by team discussions and, later, through the re-peated cycling of the draft through all members of the task force.

点击下载完整版:《2001ACCP询证指南:脱机与中止通气支持》
 


分享到:
  版权声明:

  本站所注明来源为"爱爱医"的文章,版权归作者与本站共同所有,非经授权不得转载。

  本站所有转载文章系出于传递更多信息之目的,且明确注明来源和作者,不希望被转载的媒体或个人可与我们

  联系zlzs@120.net,我们将立即进行删除处理

意见反馈 关于我们 隐私保护 版权声明 友情链接 联系我们

Copyright 2002-2025 Iiyi.Com All Rights Reserved