资讯|论坛|病例

搜索

首页 医学论坛 专业文章 医学进展 签约作者 病例中心 快问诊所 爱医培训 医学考试 在线题库 医学会议

您所在的位置:首页 > 肿瘤科医学进展 > [ASCO2015]III期结肠癌患者DNA错配修复和临床预后分析

[ASCO2015]III期结肠癌患者DNA错配修复和临床预后分析

2015-05-31 22:11 阅读:2026 来源:医脉通 作者:林* 责任编辑:林夕
[导读] 2015年ASCO年会于5月29日—6月2日在美国芝加哥召开。5月30日下午消化系统(结直肠)肿瘤口头报告专场上,Aziz Zaanan将会分享PETACC8和NCCTG N0147辅助试验中,经FOL**+/-西妥昔单抗治疗患者的III期结肠癌DNA错配修复(MMR)与临床预后分析的结果。

    2015年ASCO年会于5月29日—6月2日在美国芝加哥召开。5月30日下午消化系统(结直肠)肿瘤口头报告专场上,Aziz Zaanan将会分享PETACC8和NCCTG N0147辅助试验中,经FOL**+/-西妥昔单抗治疗患者的III期结肠癌DNA错配修复(MMR)与临床预后分析的结果。

    标准FOL**辅助治疗对MMR缺陷(包括散发型和家族型)的III期结肠癌预后影响尚未明确。本研究通过两项FOL**+/-西妥昔单抗辅助治疗的III期临床试验,对MMR状态与临床预后相关性进行探讨。

    研究方法:

    研究人员前瞻性从两项试验中收集肿瘤标本分别对MMR蛋白(MLH1,MSH2,MSH6)表达和BRAF(V600E)突变进行测定。任何MMR蛋白缺失代表了MMR缺陷(dMMR)。在MLH1缺失和BRAF基因野生型(WT)的肿瘤中分析了MLH1基因启动子的甲基化。使用分层Cox比例风险模型对MMR的状态与复发间期(TTR),无病生存期(DFS),和总生存期(OS)的相关性进行分析。多变量模型对治疗和协变量(年龄,性别,肿瘤分级,T/N分期,肿瘤部位,ECOG PS,BRAF/ KRAS)进行了校正。

    研究结果:

    总体队列dMMR的发生率为10.7%(499/4674)。MMR缺陷患者与MMR完整患者的3年(yr)DFS为75% vs.74%(HR=0.87;95%CI,0.71——1.07;Padustedj=0.196)。在生物标志物数据完整的患者中(N=4339)有405例是肿瘤dMMR,其中265例(65.4%)为散发型(BRAF基因突变型或WT型,伴MLH1甲基化),140例(34.6%)为家族型(BRAF基因WT型,伴MLH1未甲基化或MSH2缺失或MSH6缺失)。散发型和家族型肿瘤dMMR患者的DFS率类似(HR,1.15;95%CI,0.73-1.81;Padjusted=0.54)。肿瘤dMMR患者的DFS率与肿瘤pMMR且无BRAF或KRAS基因突变患者的DFS率类似(表)。这些结果与生物标志物,TTR,OS的结果一致。

    结论:

    这项大型III期结直肠癌队列研究的患者来源于FOL**+/-贝伐珠单抗的两项辅助试验,本研究发现MMR状态与预后无关。与肿瘤pMMR伴BRAF和KRAS基因均为野生型亚组相比,在肿瘤dMMR散发型和家族型亚组分析中得出相同结果:MMR状态与预后无关。临床试验信息:NCT00079274.

    阅读原文摘要

    Analysis of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) and clinical outcome in stage III colon cancers from patients (pts) treated with adjuvant FOL** +/- cetuximab in the PETACC8 and NCCTG N0147 adjuvant trials.(Abstract 3506)Authors:Aziz Zaanan, Qian Shi,et al.

    Session Type:Oral Abstract Session

    Background:The prognostic impact of deficient (d) MMR, including sporadic and familial types, in stage III colon cancer pts receiving standard adjuvant FOL** therapy remains unknown. We examined the association of MMR status with clinical outcome in two phase III clinical trials of adjuvant FOL** +/- cetuximab.

    Methods:Prospectively collected tumors from both studies were separately **yzed for MMR protein (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6) expression and mutations in BRAF (V600E)。 Loss of any MMR protein indicated dMMR. Methylation of the MLH1 gene promoter was studied in tumors with loss of MLH1 and wild-type (WT) BRAF. Associations of MMR status with time-to-recurrence (TTR), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were **yzed using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Multivariate models were adjusted for treatment and covariates (age, sex, tumor grade, T/N stage, tumor location, ECOG PS, BRAF/KRAS)。

    Results:The frequency of dMMR in the overall cohort was 10.7% (499/ 4674)。 3-year (yr) DFS for dMMR vs proficient (p) MMR pts was 75% vs 74% (HR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71-1.07; padustedj = .196)。 Among pts with complete biomarker data (N = 4339), there were 405 dMMR tumors of which 265 (65.4%) were categorized as sporadic (BRAF mutation or WT with MLH1 methylation) and 140 (34.6%) as familial (BRAF WT and unmethylated MLH1 or loss of MSH2 or MSH6)。 DFS rates of pts with sporadic and familial dMMR tumors were similar (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.73-1.81; padjusted = .54)。 Pts with dMMR tumors had similar DFS rates as did pts with pMMR tumors without BRAF or KRAS mutations (Table)。 Consistent results were found for biomarkers and TTR and OS.


    Conclusions:In this large cohort of stage III colon cancer pts enrolled in two adjuvant trials testing FOL** +/- cetuximab, MMR status was not prognostic. Similar outcomes were found for sporadic and familial dMMR cases, and when each of these dMMR subtypes was compared to pMMR tumors WT for both BRAF and KRAS genes. Clinical trial ***rmation: NCT00079274


分享到:
  版权声明:

  本站所注明来源为"爱爱医"的文章,版权归作者与本站共同所有,非经授权不得转载。

  本站所有转载文章系出于传递更多信息之目的,且明确注明来源和作者,不希望被转载的媒体或个人可与我们

  联系zlzs@120.net,我们将立即进行删除处理

意见反馈 关于我们 隐私保护 版权声明 友情链接 联系我们

Copyright 2002-2025 Iiyi.Com All Rights Reserved